Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2023 (3) TMI 1270

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....PRADESH HIGH COURT - HC (Judgement / Order / Decisions)<br>Dated:- 23-3-2023<br>Writ Petition No. 5029 of 2022 - -<br>CST, VAT & Sales Tax<br>Hon&#39;ble Shri Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari And Hon&#39;ble Shri Justice Prakash Chandra Gupta For the Petitioner : Shri Vashistha Narayan Dubey, Learned Counsel For the Respondents : Shri Umesh Gajankush, Addnl Advocate General With Ms Pran....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... filed a petition bearing W.P. No. 8560/2016 seeking quashment of the assessment order issued by the respondents for the assessment year 2012-13 for arbitrarily levy of tax on beer under residual entry under the VAT ACT, 2002(for short VAT ACT hereinafter) at the rate of 13%. The writ petition was decided in favour of the petitioner vide order dated 26.08.2016 and the assessment order was quashed.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efund the same forthwith alongwith interest. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent/State has not denied the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner. However, it is submitted that petitioner is not entitled for interest on the amount due as there is no specific provision under the VAT Act for payment of interest on refund. Heard, learned counsel for the parties and p....