Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (3) TMI 625

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....V SHIVAJI FOR THE RESPONDENT : GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX ORDER ( Per UDPR , J ) The challenge in this writ petition is to the notice under Section 70 (1) of GST Act, 2017 issued by the 3rd respondent to M/s. Sterlight technologies limited, Vishakapatnam who are the customers of the petitioner. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner Mr. G.V.Shivaji and learned Government Pleader for Com....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0 (1) of GST Act, the concerned officer may not have power to issue a direction to stop payment by the summoning party to the assessee, would however argue, he has such power Under Section 83 of GST Act which deals with provisional attachment of any property or bank account of the assessee. 5. As can be seen, the impugned notice was issued under Section 70(1) of GST Act but not under Section 83....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ibed. The impugned notice was issued under Section 70 (1) of GST Act but not in exercise of powers conferred under Section 83 of GST Act. Thus at the outset, it is clear that the 3rd respondent has exceeded his power in directing M/s. Sterlight Technologies Limited to stop further payments to the petitioner herein. Therefore, such a direction is beyond the jurisdiction of the 3rd respondent. The s....