AI Drafter ✕

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required

Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now →

Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

TMI Blog

Home /

Previous Next

Court Dismisses Claim of Prejudice in Faceless Income Tax Inquiry; "Technically Not Feasible" Argument Rejected u/s 142B(1)(a.

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....Faceless inquiry or Valuation - having replied with necessary documents has participated in the enquiry under the faceless interface and hence, it cannot now turn back and say that it is prejudiced by such a procedure. The term technically not feasible in Section 142B(1)(a) of the Act would only mean that when it is not technologically feasible to invoke such provisions between the Department and the assessee. The technical advancement had reached new heights. Hence, the contentions petitioner that it is not having the technological feasibility, deserves no consideration. - HC....

Previous Next

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Court Dismisses Claim of Prejudice in Faceless Income Tax Inquiry; "Technically Not Feasible" Argument Rejected u/s 142B(1)(a.