2023 (3) TMI 336

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i Vishwajeet Saharan, Authorised Representative for the respondent ORDER The issue involved in this appeal relates to refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) under Notification No.102 of 2007-Customs dated 14.09.2007, as amended by Notification No.93/2000-Customs. 2. The brief facts are that the appellant imported goods for trade vide 15 bills of entries during the period 9.05.2008 to 07.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er-in-appeal dated 22.03.2022 was pleased to dismiss the appeal upholding the order-inoriginal. Being aggrieved, the appellant is before this Tribunal. 4. Ld. Counsel for the appellant, Shri Jitin Singhal, inter alia, urges that the issue is no longer res integra. The Hon'ble Delhi High (jurisdictional High Court) have held in the case of Sony India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, New De....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ically held following the ruling of Sony India Pvt. Ltd. (supra), that in absence of the specific provision of Section 27, being made applicable in the said notification, time limit prescribed in Section 27 would not be automatically applicable to refund under the notification. Accordingly, he prays for allowing their appeal with consequential benefits. 5. Ld. Authorised Representative for the ....