Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (3) TMI 335

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....titioner : Mr.Nagesh Nakhul for M/s.Preeti Mohan For the Respondents : Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil Senior Central Government Standing Counsel - R1 & R2, Mr.S.Balamurugan Government Advocate - R3 & R4 ORDER The petitioner has challenged notice dated 05.11.2009 issued by R1/the Special Director of Enforcement. This notice is addressed to the District Collector, Coimbatore District, arrayed as R4 an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erved upon it. To be noted, the present writ petition is of the year 2016 and thus the question that would arise for determination is as to what had transpired in the interim and whether the elapse of fifteen years from date of order to date of institution of the writ petition was justifiable. 4. The affidavit filed in support of the writ petition proceeds on the basis that no order was ever se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tiating prosecution in terms of the applicable provisions of the FERA based on the order of adjudication dated 31.12.2001, the petitioner was asked to produce any material that it would have to indicate that it had made any request for the order in the interim or had made any statement in any pleadings before any authority that would support his belief that no orders at all had been passed. 6. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....me of the company and one Director and E.O.C.C.No.75 of 2008, as against the petitioner and another Director. 8. Thus, through all this, the petitioner has certainly been aware of the factum of order dated 31.12.2008 having been passed and this is the question that this Court has to contend with, as to whether such prolonged inaction on the part of the petitioner to even seek a copy of the orde....