Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (3) TMI 302

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s stated that the OL was appointed as the Provisional Liquidator of the Company (In Liqn.) vide order of this Court dated 19.02.2001; and the Company (In Liqn.) was ordered to be wound up vide order of this Court dated 12.01.2005. Vide the same order, the OL attached to this Court was appointed as the Liquidator of the Company (In Liqn.). 3. It is stated in the said application that the possession of the Registered Office of the Company (In Liqn.) at 2, Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi, could not be taken as the landlord informed that the Company (In Liqn.) had shifted from the said premises in the year 1978-1979. 4. The factory of the Company (In Liqn.) at 46, Fazal Gunj, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh was taken over on 18.06.2001. The land and building a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....being CA No.485/2014, under Sections 468 and 477 of the Act against the ex-directors of the Company (In Liqn.). Subsequently, and as recorded hereinabove, five ex-directors of the Company (In Liqn.) were declared to be 'proclaimed offenders'; one was deleted from the array of parties and one ex-director, namely, Mr. Ranjit Nagrath left for his heavenly abode during the pendency of the present petition. The said criminal complaint was disposed of vide order of this Court dated 18.12.2012. 7. That the claims from the creditors of the Company (In Liqn.) were invited, pursuant to the order of this Court dated 17.05.2012, by publishing the notice in the newspapers, namely, 'Statesman' (English) Delhi Edition and 'Dainik Jagran' (Hindi) Kanpur E....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....their claims have been rejected vide letters dated 19.03.2020 & 01.02.2021. Rs.29,20,981/- disbursed to 56 workmen.   *Claim of 3 Workers amounting to Rs.1,53,040/- deposited with the RBI u/s 555 as unclaimed dividend as bank details were not provided. Unsecured Central Excise Division-III, Kanpur Rs.2,13,07,816/- Rs.2,13,07,816/ Rs.58,37,793/- disbursed vide order dated 03.01.2022 on pro-rata basis.  Rs.8,97,422/- disbursed on prorata basis vide order dated 31.05.2022. Unsecured Trade Tax Rs.6,32,16,775/ Rs.6,22,12,827/- Rs.1,70,44,712/- disbursed on prorata basis vide order dated 22.01.2020 on pro-rata basis.  Rs.26,28,166/- disbursed vide order dated 31.05.2022. 9. It has been stated in the said application th....