2008 (3) TMI 280

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ocate, for the petitioner. Shri Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate, for the respondents. [Judgment per: Satish Kumar Mittal, J. (Oral)] - The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 29.11.2006 (Annexure P-8) passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise Range Rail Majra (Nawanshahar) in exercise of the power under Section 8....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... regarding not availing the alternative remedy by the petitioner. However, he submits that even if now, the petitioner avails the remedy of appeal, the department will not raise any objection of limitation or pre-deposit. 5. Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, states that in view of the aforesaid fact, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with l....