1993 (3) TMI 389

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Kuldip Singh, J. 1. Special leave granted. 2. The respondent was working as Assistant Manager (Depot) with the Food Corporation of India. He was chargesheeted on March 3, 1987 and disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him. The inquiry officer found the charges proved against him and as a consequence the disciplinary authority by the order dated September 29, 1988 dismissed the res....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tive of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. 3. Relying upon the judgment of this Court in Union of India and Anr. v. Mohd. Ramzaon Khan (1991)ILLJ29SC the High Court allowed the writ petition and set aside the order of dismissal on the short ground that the copy of the inquiry report was not supplied to the respondent. 4. It was brought to the notice of the High Court that the law laid ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... verdict upholding his dismissal, or the person has lost his right to approach the Court, in such events, the said decision would not be applicable and the prospectivity is considering these aspects that the controversies which have been buried, may not come out of the grave We do not agree with the reasoning of the High Court. This Court having specifically made the ratio in Mohd. Ramzan's ca....