2023 (1) TMI 585

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Opposite Party : C.S.C ORDER HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri A.C. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. These two revisions filed under Section 58 of U.P. Valued Added Tax Act, 2008 (hereinafter called as 'VAT Act') arise out of order passed by Commercial Tax Tribunal, Meerut Bench....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the bus and had entered into a contract with the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation (hereafter referred as "UPSRTC") for plying the bus on specified route. The agreement was entered between the assessee and UPSRTC on 29.05.1998. According to contract, the driver appointed by the assessee would drive the vehicle on the route specified in the contract and conductor appointed by UPSRTC would be pr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....7. Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that provisions of Section 3-F would not be attracted in the present case as there was no transfer of effective control of bus from the assessee to UPSRTC. According to him, UPSRTC does not have unlimited right over the bus as per the agreement, hence, there was no transfer of right to use the goods (vehicle). He has reli....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2011 UPTC 234. 9. Having heard respective counsel for the parties and perusal of material on record, it transpires that the question of law framed in the above revisions has already been dealt with by co-ordinate Bench in case of Ashok Kumar Gupta (supra), wherein this Court after taking into consideration the agreement entered between the assessee and UPSRTC had held that it was a case of tra....