Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (8) TMI 1852

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ggrieved by an interim order of this Court dated 02.07.2019 passed in I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2019 in W.P.No.13298 of 2019, wherein the learned Single Judge declined to grant interim relief and dismissed the applications. 2. Heard Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr.A.Giridhar Rao, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri S.Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Ms.Rubaina S.Khatoon, learned counsel for respondent No.1, Sri K.Lakshman, learned Assistant Solicitor General for respondent 2 and 5, Sri Vikram Pooserla, learned counsel for respondent No.3 and the learned Government Pleader for Infrastructure for respondent No.4 and perused the record. 3. The facts that led to filing of this appeal are that t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ould contend that the learned Single Judge ought not to have rejected the interim relief sought for without there being a counter filed by the respondents. The learned Single Judge ought to have granted appropriate protective interim orders so as to enable the appellant-writ petitioner to carry on the service provider operations i.e., maintenance of the aircraft belonging to the airlines, for which the appellant-writ petitioner holds a maintenance contract. The denial of such interim relief has resulted in serious inconvenience and hardship to the airlines in general and public at large. The learned Single Judge failed to see that there is a contract of service in between the appellant- writ petitioner and the domestic and international air....