Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (12) TMI 1057

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....P. Vora, Mr. Ativ Patel, Mr. Harshad R Vyas, Mr. Krishna S., Ms. Neha Agarwal, Advocates for R3 JUDGMENT Ashok Bhushan, J. Two orders dated 28.11.2022 (in order sheet) and 05.12.2022 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Court-1, Mumbai Bench in C.P.(IB) No. 494(MB)2019 have been challenged by separate Appeals by 'SREI Equipment Finance Ltd.' and 'IIRF India Realty XII Ltd.'. All the Appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common order. 2. We need to notice only the brief facts of the case which are necessary for deciding these Appeals. 2.1. C.P.(IB) No. 494(MB)2019 was filed by 'SREI Equipment Finance Ltd.' (one of the Appellants before us) against the Corporate Debtor- 'Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Limited' under Section 7. By an order dated 06.11.2019, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against the Corporate Debtor by the Adjudicating Authority and Srigopal Choudhary, the Respondent No.1 was appointed as Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) of the Corporate Debtor. On 06.01.2022, the appointment of Srigopal Choudhary was confirmed as the Resolution Professional (RP) by the Adju....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pal Choudhary. After pronouncing the order dated 28.11.2022, disposing of the above three Applications, the Adjudicating Authority directed the counsel present for three Applicants to decide the name of Resolution Professional mutually, and submit the same by way of Affidavit/Memo during the course of the day, failing which the Bench was to appoint suitable Resolution Professional. 2.4. A Joint Memo on behalf of 'SREI Equipment Finance Ltd.'- Applicant in IA 2621 of 2021 and 'IIRF India Realty XII Ltd.'- Applicant in IA No.1304 of 2022 was filed praying that one Mr. Avil Jerome Menezes be appointed by Tribunal as the new Resolution Professional. A written consent in Form AA by Mr. Avil Jerome Menezes was also submitted along with the Memo. A Memo was also filed by 'Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd.' and 'UV Asset Reconstruction Company Limited' suggesting three names of the Resolution Professionals, including the name of Mr. Sapan Mohan Garg, the said Memo was signed by Advocate appearing for 'Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd.' and 'UV Asset Reconstruction Company Limited' whereas in the heading of the Memo IA No. 3537/2022 and IA No. 2621/2021 was also mentioned. The Adjudicating A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pointed out of three persons mentioned in the Memo. The Memo was on behalf of 'Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd.' and 'UV Asset Reconstruction Company Limited', although in the heading of the Application it was wrongly claimed that it was on behalf of 'SREI Equipment Finance Ltd.'- Applicant in IA No. 2621 of 2021. There being no mutual name agreed by Applicants, the Adjudicating Authority committed error in appointing Mr. Sapan Mohan Garg who was requested to be appointed by 'Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd.'. It is submitted that the Adjudicating Authority has incorrectly observed in the order that Applicants in IA No. 3537 of 2022 and I.A. No. 2621 of 2021 have jointly mentioned the name which mistake has subsequently corrected by the Adjudicating Authority itself by order dated 05.12.2022. The Adjudicating Authority having noticed that there was no consensus in the Applicants, the Adjudicating Authority ought to have appointed Resolution Professional as requested by Applicants of IA No. 2621/2021 and IA No. 1304/2022 who claim to be having vote share of more than 69%. It is submitted that there was no occasion for accepting the name recommended by 'Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd.'....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ra, Learned Counsel appearing for Srigopal Choudhary submitted that he has already filed Appeal against the order dated 28.11.2022 removing Srigopal Choudhary as Resolution Professional being Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1443 of 2022 where the order is reserved. It is submitted that this Tribunal may not make any observation in this regard while deciding these Appeals which shall have any prejudicial effect on the rights of Srigopal Choudhary. 8. We have considered the submissions of the parties and perused the record. 9. We may first notice the objection of Shri Vikram Nankani regarding locus of 'SREI Equipment Finance Ltd.' to file the Appeal. It is submitted that 'SREI Equipment Finance Ltd.' itself is in CIRP, hence, the authorized person who has filed the Appeal i.e. Mr. Pradeep Faujdar, Senior Vice President- Legal is not competent to maintain the Appeal. 10. Shri Krishnendu Datta, Learned Senior Counsel appearing for 'SREI Equipment Finance Ltd.' refuting the submission of Counsel appearing for 'Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd.' submits that Appellant- 'SREI Equipment Finance Ltd.' has disclosed all relevant facts in the Appeals and Appeals have been filed by compe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o decide the name of RP mutually, and submit the same by way of Affidavit/Memo on record during the course of the day, failing which the Bench shall appoint suitable RP considering the facts of the case. In compliance to above Order Applicants in IA No. 3537/2022 and IA No. 2621 have jointly mentioned the names of three RPs, which are as follows: S. No. Name Registration Number 1. Ms. Preeti Gandhi IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P-02751/2022-2023/14185 2. Mr. Neehal Mahamulal Pathan IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P-01561/2018-2019/12406 3. Mr. Sapan Mohan Garg IBBI/IPA-002/IP-N00315/2017-2018/10903 Applicant in IA No. 1304/2022 has mentioned name one Mr. Avil Jerome Menezes, having Reg. No. IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P00017/2016-17/10041, in its application itself. We have noticed that there is no consensus of the applicants on any one name to be appointed as RP. In the circumstances we appoint Mr. Sapan Mohan Garg, having Reg. No. IBBI/IPA-002/IP-N00315/2017-18/10903 as an RP of Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Limited in place of Mr. Srigopal Choudhary who is directed to be discontinued with immediate effect." 14. Two significant steps were taken on 28.11.2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Memo filed by IHFL/ UVARCL with name suggestion for appointment of new Resolution Professional in terms of order dated 28.11.2022 1. IA 3537/2022 & IA 2621/2021 had been filed by the parties for inter, alia, replacement of the Resolution Professional of Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. The said IAs were heard at length by this Hon'ble Tribunal on 24.11.2022 and order were reserved in the matter. 2. When the matter was taken up for pronouncement of judgment on 28.11.2022, the Hon'ble Tribunal indicated that it had allowed the applications for replacement of the RP. However, since no RP had been suggested in the applications, it was orally directed that a Memo be filed suggesting a suitable person to be applied as the RP. This Memo is being filed in terms of the aforesaid direction. 3. Whereas there is no consensus between the Financial Creditors on a proposed resolution Professional, we are suggesting three names. It is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to appoint either of the three persons mentioned below as the Resolution Professional : (i) Ms. Preeti Gandhi, (ii) Ms. Neehal Mahamulal Pathan, or (iii) Mr. Sapan Mohan Garg as the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ce Ltd.' has been deleted. The order dated 05.12.2022 passed by the Adjudicating Authority, thus, makes it clear that there is no Joint Memo filed by 'SREI Equipment Finance Ltd.' and 'Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd.' suggesting three names including the name of Mr. Sapan Mohan Garg. When we look into the order dated 28.11.2022 (in order sheet), it is clear that the Adjudicating Authority has noted that Applicants in IA No. 2621 of 2021 and IA No. 3537 of 2022 has jointly mentioned the names of three Resolution Professional whereas the fact of the matter is that three names were only mentioned in the Memo filed by 'Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd.' i.e. Applicant in IA No. 3537 of 2022. The Adjudicating Authority was also clear that there is no consensus of the Applicants on any one name to be appointed as Resolution Professional. When we look into the order dated 28.11.2022 (in order sheet), the order begins with the words "Order pronounced in Open Court and All IA's are allowed. With regard to the name of the RP, Ld. Counsel appearing for the Applicants present and are directed to decide the name of RP mutually, and submit the same by way of Affidavit/ Memo on record during the co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ofessional whose name was submitted by Memo filed by 'Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd.'. The order dated 28.11.2022 (in order sheet) insofar as it appoints Mr. Sapan Mohan Garg as Resolution Professional is set aside and the Adjudicating Authority is directed to pass an order appointing any Resolution Professional from the eligible Resolution Professional as it deem fit and proper. 21. We may notice one more aspect of the matter. The order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed on 12.12.2022 in Civil Appeal No. 9062/2022 has been perused by us. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has referred to order passed in Civil Appeal No. 7050/2022 which order dated 14.11.2022 is to the following effect:- "C.A. No. 7050/2022 Learned senior counsel for the appellant, on instructions states that the appellant is willing to bring in the money in terms of the arbitral award, approximately Rs. 75.30 crores in the corporate creditors' account and the Resolution Professional will execute the sale deed on the said amount being so deposited. He submits on instructions that the amount will be deposited within 10 days. On the aforesaid statement taken on record, learned counsel for respo....