Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (12) TMI 931

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ified in confirming the order of AO in determining the income of the assessee at Rs.6,49,12,471/- as against Nil income. 3. We note that according to the AO the assessee is a Co-operative Society (AOP) and derives income from rent and other income. Further, the assessee filed return of income declaring a total current year income at Rs.42,96,82,992/- but however shown total income at Nil after claiming set off of brought forward losses. Under scrutiny, notices u/s. 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued to the assessee and in response to the said notices, the assessee filed details on points emerged for consideration. Further, he observed in para 3.1 of the assessment order that the assessee has shown rent income at Rs.5,73,565/- against....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....including electrical system, sub-stations, overhead lines, service lines, office and associated facilities like lands, building, works, material, stores and plants in the area of its operation vide its order dated 27-01-2011 to Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL). He held, that no business as existed from 31-01-2011 to the assessee in respect of distribution of electricity. Further, he observed the assessee could not produce any evidence to prove the restoration of renewal of license for distribution of electricity. Further, he observed the assessee was received the user charges for the use of its assets which were handed over by the assessee to the MSEDCL. He confirmed the order of AO in assessing the rental in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....were shown before the CIT(A) as the assessee has every chance in continuing its business operations. Further, we note that the CIT(A) clearly held that the assessee is not entitled to claim depreciation, establishment and general expenses and interest on loan as the assessee handed over electricity distribution and power system including all electrical system, sub-stations, overhead lines, service lines, office and associated facilities like lands, building, works, material, stores and plants in the area of its operation to MSEDCL w.e.f. 01-02-2011 which means the assessee has no business existed as on the end of F.Y. 2011 itself. The only contention has been made from 2011 to the year under consideration i.e. 2015-16, even before us, that ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lant here also referred to the decision of the Vikram Cotton Mills Ltd. of the Hon'ble Supreme Court emphasizing upon the intention of the appellant for continuing the business. Various other decisions were also cited in this regard, relying on the said "intention" of the appellant. For the identical reasons as discussed while adjudicating Ground Nos. 1 to 4, I hold that mere intention of the appellant could not be the ground for allowing the depreciation on assets claimed by the appellant, as there was no existence of the business which was established by the AO to have been permanently closed and hence such depreciation was not allowable u/s. 32(1) of the Act. Further, for the identical reasons, the Establishment and General Expenses ....