2022 (10) TMI 668
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....titioner. Shri Devendra Chaubey -Government Advocate for the Respondent ORDER Present review petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking review of the order dated 20-10-2021 passed in Writ Petition No.13142/2021 whereby the petition preferred by the review petitioner has been dismissed. 2. It is the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that without opportunity of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ma Vs. Mayawati and Others, (2013) 8 SCC 320, principles relating to review jurisdiction have been laid down. The principles relating to review jurisdiction may be summarized as follows: When the review will be maintainable: (i) Discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due diligence, was not within knowledge of the petitioner or could not be produc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... material error, manifest on the face of order, undermines its soundness or results in miscarriage of justice. (v) A review is by no means an appeal in disguise whereby an erroneous decision is reheard and corrected but lies only for patent error. (vi) The mere possibility of two views on the subject cannot be a ground for review. (vii) The error apparent on the face of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... its consideration over the submissions raised by the review petitioner, then it appears that no fresh ground has been raised by the petitioner and all the grounds including the ground of opportunity of hearing in terms of Section 107(4) and 107(8) of the SGST Act already raised by the petitioner and from different e-mails and correspondence made between the appellate authority and petitioner wher....
TaxTMI