2018 (8) TMI 2095
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he Petitioner : Mr. S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mayank Nagi and Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Shahrukh Ejaz, Advocate and Mr. Anil Kumar, Inspector, Income Tax Department. ORDER The petitioner's grievance is with respect to the re-assessment notice issued on 15.02.2013 for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2006-07. The ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssued in these proceedings; the interim order permitted the Revenue to continue with the re-assessment proceedings provided no final order was made. Consequently, the reference made to the TPO (consequent to the orders of reference) resulted in TPO determination on 29.01.2015. The TPO held that no adjustment was called for having regard to the overall circumstances of the case. This fact - though ....
TaxTMI