2022 (9) TMI 1002

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llant Shri R. Rajaraman, Assistant Commissioner (AR) For the Respondent ORDER Brief facts of the case are that appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Sanitary Wares falling under Chapter 6910 and 6911 of the First Schedule to CETA, 1985. They were availing the facility of cenvat credit of service tax paid on various input services. On verification of accounts, it was noticed that appellants....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng Services' was brought forth only after 01.04.2011. To support his argument, he relied upon the decision in the case of Sharada Motors Industries Pvt. Ltd. - 2019-TIOL-2592-CESTAT MAD; Chennai Containers Terminals Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner - 2022 (58) G.S.T.L. 359 (Tri.-Chennai). 3. Ld. Counsel was fair enough to submit that after 01.04.2011, the appellant is not eligible for credit on the basi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the decision of the Tribunal in the case of TIDC India Ltd. Vs CGST & Central Excise, Chennai North - 2022-TIOL-339-CESTAT-MAD to argue that penalty requires to be waived. He prayed that the appeal may be allowed accordingly. 5. Ld. A.R. Shri R. Rajaraman supported the findings in the impugned order. 6. Heard both sides. 7. The issue is whether the appellant is eligible for credit on 'Outdoor....