2022 (9) TMI 1002

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aishankar, Advocate For the Appellant Shri R. Rajaraman, Assistant Commissioner (AR) For the Respondent ORDER Brief facts of the case are that appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Sanitary Wares falling under Chapter 6910 and 6911 of the First Schedule to CETA, 1985. They were availing the facility of cenvat credit of service tax paid on various input services. On verification of ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the amendment excluding 'Outdoor Catering Services' was brought forth only after 01.04.2011. To support his argument, he relied upon the decision in the case of Sharada Motors Industries Pvt. Ltd. - 2019-TIOL-2592-CESTAT MAD; Chennai Containers Terminals Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner - 2022 (58) G.S.T.L. 359 (Tri.-Chennai). 3. Ld. Counsel was fair enough to submit that after 01.04.2011, the appell....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tent to evade payment of duty. He relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of TIDC India Ltd. Vs CGST & Central Excise, Chennai North - 2022-TIOL-339-CESTAT-MAD to argue that penalty requires to be waived. He prayed that the appeal may be allowed accordingly. 5. Ld. A.R. Shri R. Rajaraman supported the findings in the impugned order. 6. Heard both sides. 7. The issue is whethe....