Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2008 (1) TMI 294

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Patil with Shri M.H. Patil for Respondent. [Order]. - P.C. : The Revenue has preferred this appeal on the questions formulated as under : (a) Whether CESTAT, Mumbai, was correct in adopting the Notification No. 13/2003-C.E. (N.T.), dated 01.03.2003 for the goods cleared before the issuance of the Notification. (b) Whether the Notification No. 13/2003-C.E. (N.T.), dt.01.03.2003 can be applied re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ule 4(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, an amount equivalent to credit taken, i.e. the amount of Rs.51,101/- was required to be reversed. Considering the rule as it then stood, the Commissioner recorded a finding that the respondents would be entitled to the credit of the duty paid on Rs.86,500/- i.e. Rs.13,480/- and dismissed the appeal. 3. In the appeal preferred by the respondents herein, the learned....