Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (9) TMI 90

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e. Respondent Through: Mr. Aditeya Bali, Advocate for Ms. Kavita Jha, Advocate. J U D G M E N T MANMOHAN, J (Oral): 1. Present Income Tax Appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 16th December, 2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('ITAT') in ITA No. 4156/Del./2017 for the Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. Learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the ITAT has erred in dele....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....roperty and was part of the business activity, investment in the partnership firm was made wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business, the advances recoverable and forward cover receivable included in the advances were business advances and the same were given to the suppliers with whom regular business transactions had been carried out, the advance to the DLF Ltd. given for the purpos....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is disallowable. It was also part of the record that another advances interest has been charged by the assessee as found out by the Id. CIT (A) on going through the Schedule 17 of the balance sheet. Since, the loans &  advances have been given on account of commercial expediency and notional interest can be charged on such advances or interest can be disallowed u/s 36(l)(iii). In the case of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....this aspect of allowability of interest u/s 36(1)(iii), we hereby decline to interefere with the order of the ld. CIT (A). The appeal of the revenue on this ground is dismissed." 5. On the issue of addition of Rs.37,40,940/- made under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, the ITAT observed that the Appellant had own funds of Rs.39,796.21/- lakhs which were far more than the investments of Rs.729.98 ....