Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2022 (7) TMI 1239

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ropped the proceedings initiated by the Show Cause Notice as indicated in the table below:- SI. No. SCN No. & date Amount of C.E.D. Period 1. MP-13/SCN/ISWP/Telco- III/97/449 dtd. 29.5.97 Rs.8,29,962.91 Dec '96 to March '97 2. MP-13/SCN/ISWP/Telco- III/97/737 dtd. 15.09.97 Rs.36,28,081 April' 97 to July' 97 2.1 Appellant had entered into an agreement with TISCO for conversion of billets into wire rods for job of basis. After during the course of conversion, certain losses, such as burning losses occurred to the extent of 7%. Accordingly, appellants were required to return 90 tonnes of wire rods after conversion against every 100 tonnes of billets provided by TISCO. Whatsoever, waste ari....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....id not throw any light as to whether the same was actually included in the assessable value or not rather, he concluded that all the cost must have been included in the assessable value, since it was fixed by the principal, i.e. M/s TISCO. The adjudicating authority did not mention any such instance which could prove that such extra consideration formed part of the assessable value fixed by M/s TISCO. Purely on assumption, he concluded that all such costs were included in the assessable value. There appears no evidence on record to suggest that the same were included in the assessable vale. 8. The adjudicating authority also erred in placing reliance upon the CEGAT decision in the case of Surindra Steel Rolling Mills-Vs-CCE, Chandi....