Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (7) TMI 423

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r>S.T.R.P No.8 OF 2021 - -<br>CST, VAT & Sales Tax<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE Petitioners (By Shri. Jeevan J Neralagi, AGA) Respondent (By Shri. Atul K Alur, Advocate) ORDER P.S. DINESH KUMAR J, This Revision Petition by the Revenue is filed for consideration of the following question: "(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... VAT 120, and the same were being assessed at the rate of 4% on the sale value. 4. Based on scrutiny of e-sugam Forms and the Enforcement Report dated 30.01.2015, the Assessing Authority (Deputy Commissioner of Commerical Taxes (Audit & Recovery)-5, Mangaluru) passed re-assessment order dated 30.11.2015 for the Assessment Year 2013-14 denying the benefit of payment of tax under Composition Scheme....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed Tax Rules, 2005), the option to pay tax by way of composition shall not be available to a dealer, who has made inter-State purchase. The Assessing Authority and the First Appellate Authority, on appreciation of facts on record have rightly denied the said benefit. The KAT has allowed the appeals on an erroneous assumption that the goods in question are not &#39;goods in stock&#39;. In view of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ate as equipments and consumables for its business. Assessee is not a dealer of said goods. 10. In the case of Shri. Anantha Padmanabha Bhat, rightly relied upon by the KAT, this Court has held that the vitrified tiles used in the restaurant owned by the assessee therein were not sold by him in the regular course of business but they were used for the flooring of the restaurant. Hence, it had be....