Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2022 (7) TMI 423

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or consideration of the following question: "(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the Petitioner's case the Tribunal was right in law, in allowing the Respondent's Appeal and holding that the Respondent was eligible to pay taxes under the scheme of composition as provided for under Section 15(1) (c) of the Act, especially when the Respondent had effected purchase of machinery in the course of interstate trade for use in business activity of the Respondent?" 2. Heard Shri. Jeevan J.Neralagi, learned AGA for petitioners and Shri. Atul K.Alur, learned Advocate for the respondent . 3. Brief facts of the case are, respondent is a Private Limited Company in the business of sale of food and drinks. It has opt....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Assessing Authority and the First Appellate Authority, on appreciation of facts on record have rightly denied the said benefit. The KAT has allowed the appeals on an erroneous assumption that the goods in question are not 'goods in stock'. In view of the admitted facts, the impugned order is unsustainable in law. 7. Shri. Atul Alur for the assessee submitted that respondent is in the business of food and beverages. It has purchased Sealing Machines etc. as capital equipment and consumables for the Restaurant. As held by this Court in the case of Anantha Padmanabha Bhat Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Another W.P. No. 54356, 54357/2015 (Tax-res) and W.P. Nos. 57006-57027/2015 decided on 03.06.2016, the inter-State purchas....