Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (7) TMI 1349

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....br>SHRI P.K. CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) and SHRI RAJU, MEMBER(TECHNICAL) Shri Prem Ranjan Kumar, Advocate for the Appellant (s) Shri S.Mukhopadhyay, Authorized Representative for the Respondent (s) ORDER The present appeal is against the Order-in-Appeal No.23/JSR/2011 dated 29.03.2011. The appellant M/s.Shri Krishna Laxmi Steel Ugyog Pvt.Ltd. is a manufacturer of MS ingots and were making us....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., but they did not pay the duty in cash for each of their clearances during the period of default, but continued paying the same utilizing Cenvat Credit and thus the duty amounting to Rs.1,43,50,657/- so paid by them by utilizing Cenvat Credit during the said period of default appears to be treated as removal without payment of Central Excise duty under provision of sub-rule 3A of Rule 8 of Centra....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hyay, learned Authorized Representative for the Respondent-Revenue. 3. The learned Advocate submitted that the provisions of Rule 8 (3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, based on which the demand for duty has been raised by the Department has been struck down by the various High Courts as ultra vires. In this connection, he referred to some of the decisions, (i) 2014 (310) Excise Law Time 833 (....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Respondent-Revenue submitted that the present issue regarding the applicability of Rule 8 (3A) of the Central Excise Rule, 2002, has been decided by various High Courts against Revenue. However, Revenue has challenged all such orders by filing SLP before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has admitted the SLP and had stayed the operation of all such decisions of the High Cour....