TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2022 (5) TMI 1303
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....resentative for the Respondent ORDER Confirmation of demand against clearance of Bagasse and Press Mud without following Rules 6(3)(i) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 that prescribed payment of an amount at the rate of 6% for not maintaining separate accounts for input services used on manufacture of goods chargeable to duty and exempted goods, holding Bagasse and Press Mud as exempted goods. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of exempted goods as per provisions of Rules 6(3) of the CCR, 2004. Matter was adjudicated upon, demand including interest and penalty etc. were confirmed both at the adjudication level and Commissioner (Appeals) level, Hence the appeal. 3. During the course of hearing learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. J. N. Somaiya submitted that the issue is no more res integra in view of series of decisio....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sse which is non-excisable goods. 4. In response to such submissions learned Authorised Representative for the Respondent-Department argued in favour of the reasoning and rationality of the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and sought no interference of this Tribunal in such reasoned order. 5. I have perused the case record, relevant provisions of law and the relied upon case laws. As c....