2022 (5) TMI 1166
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....T and CX Commissionerate, Rourkela is incompetent in view of provision laid in Section 174 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for brevity referred to as "the CGST Act"), the Petitioner approached this Court by way of the writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash Order-in-Original dated 25th February, 2022 passed by said Officer pertaining to financial year 2015-16 raising demand comprising the following: i. Service Tax including Cesses for an amount of Rs.54,05,706/- under Section 73(2) read with proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 73; ii. interest thereon as applicable; iii. penalty of Rs.10,000/- under Section 77(1)(a) for failure to take registration in contravention of Sectio....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e provided during 2015- 16". At Para 3.8 of the writ petition, the Petitioner has candidly admitted that the Adjudicating Authority had directed it to appear for personal hearing through video conference on 25th January, 2022. However, the Petitioner did not choose to avail the opportunity of personal hearing. As a consequence of non-cooperation of the petitioner, the Adjudicating Authority had proceedced to confirm the demand of Service Tax as stated in the Show Cause pertaining to financial year 2015-16. 4. It appears from the averments and documents enclosed to the writ petition that the Petitioner did not choose to participate in the proceeding under Section 73. Mr. Chimanka appearing for CGST Authority submitted that the fact of not t....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI