Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1980 (2) TMI 2

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench. The question of law has been referred to this court for its opinion Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the penalty proceedings having been referred to the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax on February 22, 1971, i.e., prior to the amendment of section 275 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, w.e.f. April 1, 1971, section 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sfied that the assessee had furnished inaccurate particulars of his income and the IAC accordingly imposed a penalty of Rs. 7,524 by his order dated 15th March, 1973. Aggrieved by that order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Tribunal. It was contended on behalf of the assessee before the Tribunal that tinder s. 275 of the Act an order imposing penalty could be passed by the IAC after th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Section 275 of the Act, which lays down the period of limitation for imposing a penalty, was amended with effect from lst April, 1971. It is not disputed that if the amended provision is applicable in the instant case, then the imposition of penalty could not be held to be barred by time. It has been held by the Allahabad, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka and Orissa High Courts in Hargu Charan ....