2021 (8) TMI 1289
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....th July, 2021 passed in IA Nos. 368/2020 and 555/2020 in CP (IB) No. 136/Chd/Pb/2017 by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chandigarh Bench. It is brief order and reads as under:- "IA No.368/2020 Ms. Munisha Gandhi, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that though reply from the first respondent has been received but the reply of second respondent has not been served on her till date. Since the same is available in the Registry of Chandigarh Bench filed vide Diary No. 00019/12 dated 22.02.2021, learned Senior Counsel for the applicant in the CA is permitted to collect a copy of the same from Registry. 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the applicant may file rejoinder, if ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the IAs are pending before the Adjudicating Authority and no decision is being taken. The Learned Counsel refers to Annexure A-6 which is order passed by this Tribunal in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 21 of 2021- "Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. vs. Ashok Oswal & Ltd.". It is stated that the said Appeal was filed with regard to the same I.As as the same were not decided and this Appellate Tribunal on 19th January, 2021 observed and directed, as under:- "19.01.2021: The impugned order is not an order adjudicating upon the rights of the parties. It merely says that due to paucity of time, the matter stands adjourned to 18th January, 2021, which date has already elapsed. Mr. Manish Jain, Advocate representing the Appellant submits tha....
TaxTMI