2022 (3) TMI 860

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....quest) for the Appellant Shri N.N. Prabhudesai, Superintendent, Authorised Representative for the Respondent ORDER Appellant is absent. A request letter for adjournment of the case has been received from it on the ground that its previous conducting Counsel has expired and it is in the process of appointing of a new Advocate. Simultaneously appellant has made a request in writing expressi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... [1999 (112) ELT 749 (SC)] (iv) Mysore Metal Industries Vs. Collector of Customs, Bombay [1988 (36) ELT 369 (SC)] (v) Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai Vs. Dilip Kumar & Company [2018 (361) ELT 577 (SC)] 3. On perusal of the case record, it is observed that duty of Rs. 1,45,700/- that has been confirmed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) vide his order dated 05.01.20....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 33,017/- for the period of Oct 2010 to March 2011. (iv) I impose the equal penalty of Rs. 1,45,700/- under Rule 25(1) (d) of Central excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. 1944. 4. Appellant paid the confirmed demand under protest and now express its willingness to pay the penalty of Rs. 1,45,700/-. Rest of demands were dropped and what is required to be....