2006 (6) TMI 536
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ent. ORDER This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal dated 30th July, 2003 which upheld the Order-in-Original that confirmed the demand of Service tax, sought interest and imposed penalty. 2. The relevant facts that arise for consideration are that the appellant are registered under Service tax provisions as security service provider and got the registration on 20-12-2000. The appell....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... receipt of payment from their service receivers. It was also contention of the Advocate that Service tax amount calculated is wrong, in as much as the amount of gross payment received by them is inclusive of service tax. 4. Learned D.R. submits that the appellant were registered under Service tax provisions and they should have paid Service tax on their own without demand by the department.....