2022 (3) TMI 193

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ESHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER Ms. Disha Gursahaney, Advocate for the Appellant Mrs. C. V. Savitha, Superintendent, Authorised Representative for the Respondent ORDER PER : ANJANI KUMAR The appellants have filed refund claims for the period April 2006 to March 2007 and April 2007 to June 2007 for a total amount of Rs. 78,68,626/-. Show-cause notices were issued alleging that the appellants a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2005 and that when a particular service is not taxable, availment of input or input service is not permissible and consequently, question of refund under Rule 5 does not arise. Hence, this appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the services rendered by them are in the nature of 'Consulting Engineering Services' taxable under Section 65(105)(g) of F....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....TAT-BANG. • Ingersoll-Rand International (India) Ltd. vs. CST, Bangalore: 2015 (38) STR 771 (Tri.-Bang.) • Asst. Commissioner OIO dated 8.8.2018 in appellant's own case. • Commissioner's Appeal OIO dated 29.09.2010 in appellant's own case. 2.1 Learned counsel further submits that refund claimed by the appellant is in respect of an eligible credit as held i....