Court Finds Insufficient Evidence of Timely Notice Service; Grants Dealer Another Chance Under TNVAT Rules.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Service of notice - whether pre-revisional notices was served on the writ petitioner-dealer - This is a fit case to give the benefit of doubt to the writ petitioner-dealer. This means that it has not been conclusively established {vide explanation to Rule 19(1)(a) of TNVAT Rules} that the pre-revisional notices dated 18.08.2014 have been duly served on the writ petitioner-dealer on 31.08.2014. This further means that the impugned orders will have to be interfered with on this short point and the writ petitioner-dealer has to be given opportunity afresh to show cause.- HC....