Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (2) TMI 247

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was issued, proposing demand of Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 2,25,96,901/- along with interest taken wrongly on the Furnace Oil / fuel used in the generation of electricity, part of which cleared to other unit and residential colony during the period 2004-05 to 2007-08. It has also proposed to impose a penalty of equal amount of cenvat duty. By the impugned OIO dated. 24.12.2009, the Commissioner disallowed the Cenvat credit of Rs. 2,25,96,901 along with interest and imposed a penalty of equal amount of Cenvat credit under Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944.Therefore, the appellant filed the present appeal. 2. The appellant in grounds of appeal submitted that thePOY Division and DTY di....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... GUJARAT NARMADA VALLEY FERTILIZERS CO. LTD.- 2012 (286) ELT 481 (SC) * RAMALA SAHKARI CHINI MILLS LTD- 2010-SC-102-SC-CX * MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD- 2009 (240) ELT 641 * M/s GNFC - 2012 (286) ELT 481 3. Shri Vinod Lukose, Learned Superintendent (AR) appearing on behalf of revenue submits that issue is already decided by this Tribunal in case of MEHSANA DISTRICT CO-OP. MILK PRODUCERS UNION Vs. CEX. AHMEDABAD -III 2019(31) G.S.T.L. 484 (Tri-Ahmd). ER-1 submitted by the Appellant for the period April 2004 to March 2008, revealed that appellant had not declared the manufacturing of electricity and steam and supply of electricity to the DTY Division and the residential colony. This itself proves that appellant have suppressed the fac....