Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (1) TMI 405

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n certificate for the period during which the goods imported under the aforesaid Bills of Entry have been detained from the date of filing of the Bills of Entry till the date of assessment and release of the said goods and consequently, refund the amount of Rs. 40,61,375/- paid by the Petitioner Entity towards detention, demurrage, warehouse charges, under protest, while seeking release of 90% of the imported goods with interest. 2. Subsequently, the petitioner filed a Writ Miscellaneous Petition No. 3735 of 2021, seeking amendment of the prayer set out in the original Writ Petition and the proposed amendment reads as under : "Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to take suitable action against the 3rd and 4th res....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ontemplate various procedures to be followed. The Learned Counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent contended that in respect of the contractual obligations between the parties, no writ is entertainable and such disputed facts are to be adjudicated before the competent forum. Thus, the Writ Petition became infructuous as the relief originally sought for by the petitioner had been granted. 6. The Learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Customs Department also made a submission that during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the relief sought for by the petitioner had been granted and therefore, nothing survives in this Writ Petition. 7. In spite of the submissions made on behalf of the respondents, the Learned Co....