Director Held Liable for Cheque Dishonor Due to Lack of Evidence of Non-Involvement in Company Operations.

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws →

Director Held Liable for Cheque Dishonor Due to Lack of Evidence of Non-Involvement in Company Operations.

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....Dishonor of Cheque - Vicarious liability on the Director of the company - involvement of the director (respondent No. 2) in the affars of the company or not - no material has been placed on record, much less of incontrovertible or unimpeachable nature, to establish that respondent No. 2 was in fact not responsible for the day-to-day affairs of the accused company. Rather, despite the legal notice having been issued to respondent No. 2 as well, no reply was furnished on her behalf to the effect that she was not in-charge of or responsible to the accused company for the conduct of its business at the relevant time. - no ground for quashing of the summoning order - HC....

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Director Held Liable for Cheque Dishonor Due to Lack of Evidence of Non-Involvement in Company Operations.