Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2021 (12) TMI 722

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent for rice millers and traders and are selling Agricultural Produce (Rice) as per the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Act (APMC Act) of the State. 3. The applicant has sought advance ruling in respect of the following questions: 1. Whether the applicant is entitled to collect GST on Supply of services which pertains to selling of agricultural produce as per APMC Act? 2. Is there any special case where the applicant has to collect GST on the Service provided (Branded and unbranded)? 4. Admissibility of the application: The question is about "determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both" and hence is admissible under Section 97(2)(e) of the CGST Act 2017. 5. Brief Facts of the case: The applicant furnishes some facts relevant to the issue: 5.1 The applicant states that he is rice canvassing commission agent for Rice millers and traders. They are selling agricultural produce (rice) as per the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Act (APMC Act) of the State. 5.2 The applicant contends that they are not raising any sale invoices other than commission bill for their services rendered. Paddy and Rice are the Food Crops as per the Karna....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essential identity" so as to postulate a contention that the process of de husking alters the identity of paddy into that of rice, a different commodity. 5.6 The applicant also relies on the ratio of judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India by larger bench of Hon'ble three Judges in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law) Board Revenue (Taxes), Ernakulam vs Pio Food Packers (1980) 46 STC 63 in which the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is that pineapple fruit even after it is processed into slices, added with sugar as a preservative and canned, the essential characteristic of pineapple as a fruit is not altered: "In the present case, there is no essential difference between pineapple fruit and the canned pineapple slices. The dealer and the consumer regard both as pineapple. The only difference is that the sliced pineapple is a presentation of fruit in a more convenient form and by reason of being canned it is capable of storage without spoiling. The additional sweetness in the canned pineapple arises from the sugar added as a preservative. On a total impression, it seems to us, the pineapple slices must be held to possess the same identity as t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....produce. The said activity falls under Service Code (SAC)/ Heading 998619 of Section 8 and chapter 99 of GST Tariff and the same reads as "Supporting services to agriculture, hunting, forestry and fishing - other support services to agriculture, hunting, forestry and fishing". 4. The effective rates for the services are notified under Notification No. 11/ 2017-C.T.(Rate) and 12/ 2017-C.T. (Rate), both dated 28.06.2017 and the said notifications list the activity of "Commission Agent" under clause (g) of Sl.No.24 and Sl.No.54 of the said notifications and description of the mentioned as "Services by any Agricultural Produce Marketing committee or Board or Services Provided by a commission agent for sale or purchase of agricultural produce". 5. The terms "agricultural produce" has been defined under notifications No.11/ 2017-C.T. (Rate) and 12/2017-C.T. (Rate), both dated 28.06.2017 and the relevant portion is reproduced as under; Sl.No. Chapter, Section, Heading, Group or Service Code (Tariff) Description of Services Rate (per cent.) Condition (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 54 Heading 9986 Services relating to cultivation of plants and rearing of all life forms of animals, exc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on to further processing by the cultivator, 'milling' is done by the millers, which is normally neither done by the producer nor the cultivator. The essential character of paddy has also been changed to 'Rice, which is readily consumable, but paddy is raw and requires certain milling process including husking, steaming, de-browning, polishing, sorting etc., these processes are paddy harvesting, cutting, handling thrashing and cleaning. Thus all the above three criteria to be satisfied to be called "Agricultural produce" were not fulfilled and therefore goods/ Rice being dealt by the applicant cannot be termed as "Agricultural Produce". 7. Thus the activity of the applicant in the instant case viz., the activity of canvassing for Rice as 'Commission Agent' is not covered under clause(g) of Sl.No,24 of the notification No.11/2017-Central Tax dated 28.06.2017 and the services of 'Commission Agent' for rice millers and traders is falling under SAC 9961. Hence the activities of Commission Agent by canvassing for Rice of the applicant attract Central Tax-CGST @ 9% and KGST @ 9%(IGST-18%). As the said activity attract Central Tax, the applicant is required to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r; 10.2 In the instant case, the applicant is engaged in providing the services of 'Commission Agent' for rice millers and traders, where in applicant is of the opinion that the said transaction falls under entry at Si No. 54 of the Notification No12/2017-C.T. (Rate), dated 28.06.2017, and exempted from levy of GST. Clauses (a) to (f) of S1 No. 54 cover the services relating to agricultural operations, supply of farm labour, processing of agricultural produce, leasing of agro machinery and land, services relating to agricultural produce and agricultural extension services. Commission agent services do not fall in any of the said clauses, and the same is also not claimed by the applicant. 10.3 The applicant claims that the services are covered under clause (g) of Sl.No. 54 of the said Notification, which reads as: "(g) services by any Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee or Board or services provided by a commission agent for sale or purchase of agricultural produce." 10.4 The crux of the issue to decide is whether 'rice' can be treated as agricultural produce in terms of the subject Notification, and the commission agent services provided by the applicant to ri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the produce has also undergone change. Therefore, rice cannot be treated as agricultural produce in terms of para 2(d) of the said Notification, and the commission agent services for sale or purchase of rice does not fall in the ambit of SI.No. 54 of the Notification 11/2017-CT(Rate) dtd 28.06.2017 and therefore not eligible for any exemption from levy of GST. The supporting judgments mentioned by applicant are not squarely applicable in this scenario as paddy and rice are distinctly identifiable commodities as discussed above. 10.6 Further to be covered under the entry, the services by a commission agent should be directly linked to the services relating to the cultivation and this is made amply clear by the use of the words "by way of which links the cultivation process and the marketing process. The applicant is not assisting the cultivators of paddy, instead is assisting the manufacturers of rice/rice millers and traders, and hence the link is not established in this case. Hence the activity of the applicant is not covered under clause (g) of Entry No.54 of Notification No.12/2017- CT (rate) dated 28.06.2021 and hence is not exempted. 11. The activity of the applicant in ....