Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2021 (11) TMI 801

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nding the time limit in exercise of its power under the proviso to Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 is valid in law. Brief facts: i) The respondent carries on the business of export and import and had, in the course of business, imported dry dates from, according to him, Jebel Ali UAE/Dubai, declaring the country of origin as Oman. There was a search on 21.09.2019 by the Customs Officials and several summons issued under Section 108 of the Act. The respondent appeared in response to a few summons but not all. Twenty two (22) containers of dry dates, for which the shelf life is stated to be two years, were seized on the ground that the place of origin was Pakistan and not Oman as contended by the respondent. This is the crux of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d of six months invoking the proviso to Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, and received by the respondent on 07.10.2020. iii)The seizure was challenged by way of W.P.No.19977 of 2020 inter alia on the premise that the appellant has failed to comply with the timelines prescribed under Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. Though, the appellants and the respondent have raised certain other grounds, however both have confined their arguments as to whether the intimation of extension dated 30.09.2020 served on the respondent dated 07.11.2020 is within the period prescribed under Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. It is the case of the respondent that in terms of the proviso to Section 110(2) of the Customs Act,1962 the exte....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... signed on 29.09.2020 by the officer. The date of seizure is 06.03.2020 and the period of six months (original period of seizure) expires on 05.09.2020. The intimation of extension should have been brought to the knowledge of the petitioner on or before 05.09.2020, accompanied by the reasons recorded for the extension. However, by virtue of the relaxation ordinance, such time stands extended to 30.09.2020. However, and admittedly, the intimation has been received by the petitioner only on 07.10.2020, beyond the date stipulated in the proviso to Section 110(2) and the reasons for extension have also not been supplied. The counter filed by the revenue also refers to subsequent extensions granted in September which are not relevant, as a count....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er clause (a) or (b) of the said section; and (ii) the 31st day of December 2020 shall be the end date to which the time limit for completion or compliance of such action shall stand extended." 6. The above notification extending the time limit for completion or compliance of various action such as completion of any proceeding or issuance of any order, notice, intimation, notification or sanction or approval, by whatever name called, by any authority, commission, tribunal, by whatever name called, from 30.09.2020 to 31.12.2020. The above notification extending the time limit from 30.09.2020 to 31.12.2020 for various actions set out thereon has apparently not been brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge....