TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2021 (11) TMI 619
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... M/s Ramji Acro Ltd., M/s Sharman Woolen Mills Ltd., M/s Shiv Woolen Mills, M/s Shiwalya Spinning and Weaving Mills (P) Ltd., M/s Shree Ganesh Acro Yarns Pvt. Ltd., M/s Sportking India Ltd., M/s Udey Udyog, M/s Venus Texspin Ltd., The Royal Thai Government Republic of India, Ludhiana Spinners Association, Northern India Textile Mills' Association, M/s Indian Acrylics Limited, M/s Pasupati Acrylon Limited, M/s Vardhman Acrylic Limited, Tai Acrylic Fibre Co. Ltd., Thailand HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA, PRESIDENT, HON'BLE MS. SULEKHA BEEVI C.S., MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND HON'BLE MR. P.V. SUBBA RAO, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Shri Basava Prabhu Patil, Senior Advocate and Ms. Reena Khair, Shre Rajesh Sharma, and Ms. Shreya Dahiya, Advocates for the App....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....g duty was continued through sunset reviews and for the third sunset review, the Central Government issued a notification dated 01.06.2015 for continuation of anti-dumping duty on goods originating in or exported from the Thailand and Korea RP. Thereafter, a fourth sunset review was initiated for imposition of anti-dumping duty on the subject goods originating in or exported from Thailand. The designated authority, in its final findings notified on 31.08.2020, recommended for imposition of anti-dumping duty. 4. Shri Rakesh Kumar, learned authorised representative appearing for the Union of India has stated that the comments submitted by the Government of India in the appeal filed by M/s. Jubilant Ingrevia Limited vs. Union of India and fiv....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s reproduced below: "46. Thus, for all the reasons stated above, it is not possible to sustain the decision taken by the Central Government, contained in the Office Memorandum dated 14.12.2020, not to impose anti-dumping duty despite a recommendation having been made by the designated authority for imposition of anti-dumping duty. The matter would, therefore, have to be remitted to the Central Government to take a fresh decision on the recommendation made by the designated authority. 47. Though rule 18 provides that the Central Government has to take a decision within three months of the date of publication of final findings by the designated authority, but as the matter is being remitted to the Central Government for taking a fresh dec....