2021 (10) TMI 462

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... passed by this Court while disposing of the Tax Appeal No.465 of 2019 as not pressed on the ground that the tax effect involved in the Tax Appeal was below the prescribed monetary limit of Rs. 1 Cr. as per the CBDT Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019. 2. It is averred by the Revenue that after receiving the copy of the order passed by this Court, the concerned officer of the department verified the issue in the matter that had arisen, according to him, as a result of audit objection was accepted by the department. Therefore, the matter would fall under the exceptional clause (c) of Para 10 of the Amended Circular of Board No.03 of 2018 dated 20.08.2018 as modified by the Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019. 2.1 Hence, this ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r Section 263 of the I.T. Act was passed 28.11.2013. 3.1 Aggrieved by the order of dis-allowance dated 28.11.2013, a statutory appeal has been preferred by the respondent before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ("the ITAT" for short), whereby the ITAT has rejected the order passed under Section 263 of the I.T. Act on 20.01.2017 and therefore, the Tax Appeal was preferred before this Court. 3.2 According to the respondent, this request of seeking to recall of the order is on account of the audit objection, which has not been placed on record. If the audit objections pertained to the original assessment and as a consequence to such audit objection, a notice under Section 148 of the I.T. Act was issued, then such audit objections cannot....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s finalized on 14.12.2011 at a total income of Rs. 82,63,600/- restricting the deduction under Section 10B of the I.T. Act at Rs. 2,21,19,603/- as against Rs. 2,83,46,239/- claimed by the assessee in his return of income. With these facts, the order of the ITAT had been upheld. 5. The department is before this Court seeking to reopen the assessment of the respondent based on the audit objections raised at the relevant point of time. While noticing that the Assessment Order passed under Section 143 (3) read with Section 148 of the I.T. Act has already been decided by this Court in Tax Appeal No.460 of 2019 and allied matters on 16.09.2019, the notice had been issued under Section 263 (1) of the I.T. Act on 17.10.2013 for the same assessme....