2015 (10) TMI 2811

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h Jain, A.R. for the respondent ORDER Heard the ld. Counsel for the appellant and the Id. A.R. for  Revenue. 2.  The appeal is preferred against the adjudication order dated 9.1.2008, confirming demand of service tax of Rs. 90,81,301/- along with interest and penalty, as specified therein. The demand is assessed on the premise that the appellant received transport of goods by road se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is eventually identified and payments were made on this basis. Statements of some other transporters engaged by the appellant were recorded during the process of adjudication which revealed that no consignment notes were generated by the transporter and payments were made only on the basis of particulars generated during weighment. 4.  Rejecting the contention of the appellant that the activ....