Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (1) TMI 1905

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ESH FOR THE APPELLANT : ADVS.SRI.A.V.THOMAS (SR.), SMT.M.M.JASMIN, SRI.NIDHI SAM JOHNS FOR THE RESPONDENT : ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH, ADV. SRI.SHAJI THOMAS, ADV. SRI.BINU PAUL, BY ADV. SRI.T.V.VINU, ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. RAFEEK V.K. SRI.R.S.KALKURA, SC, SBT JUDGMENT V. CHITAMBARESH, J Can the attachments effected subsequent to the creation of equitable mortgage be effaced after the property is purchased by another in sale conducted by the Recovery Officer of the Debts Recovery Tribunal? 2. The fifth respondent had mortgaged his property (3.44 ares in R.S. No. 38/2 and 0.9443 are in R.S. No. 393/3) situated in Kollam west village to the fourth respondent bank ('the bank' for short) as se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... which Ext.P5 order of delivery was issued by the Recovery Officer. Mutation was effected in favour of the petitioner and land tax was also paid for the property evidenced by Ext.P6 receipt which however contained an endorsement by the village officer as to the existence of certain attachments from court. 4. ExtP7 encumbrance certificate obtained by the petitioner reflected that several attachments were made at the instance of respondents 6 to 11 subsequent to the creation of equitable mortgage in favour of the bank on 25.03.2000. The first of such attachments was on 21.10.2000 and the others were on 04.11.2000, 03.11.2001, 15.03.2003 and 22.06.2004 in addition to an attachment made in O.S. No. 193/2001. The Writ Petition has been filed fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eb, dividend or other moneys contrary to the such attachment, shall be void as against all claims enforceable under the attachment. [(2) Nothing in this section shall apply to any private transfer or delivery of the property attached or of any interest therein, made in pursuance of any contract for such transfer or delivery entered into and registered before the attachment.] Explanation- For the purpose of this section, claims enforceable under an attachment include claims for the rateable distribution of assets.(emphasis supplied). Similarly Order XXXVIII Rule 10 CPC reads thus: "10. Attachment before judgment not to affect rights or strangers, nor bar decree-holder from applying for sale-Attachment before judgment shall not affect ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....achment by the civil court under Code of Civil Procedure. That order of attachment does not override or deserves to be preferred over the rights of a mortgagee or the effect of the mortgage as an encumbrance". 8. I shall quote from a few other decisions also to give completeness to the judgment taking note of the elaborate arguments of the petitioner and the absence of any case law on the point under the Act. (i) Thiru Venkita Reddiar Vs. Noordeen [1977 KLT 877]: "The consequence is on the happening of a judicial sale all previous attachment effected upon the property sold fall to the ground". (ii) Leelavathy Bai Vs. Gangadharan [1987 (2) KLT SN Case No. 38]: "Attachment will not confer any title in favour of the person who attache....