2019 (4) TMI 1998

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ment Advocate ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side. 2. The writ petitioner is a registered medical practitioner. She has been practicing as a Sonologist in the Cancer Institute at Chennai in 1997-2002. She thereafter moved to Trichy and commenced her private practice and she has been associated with various MRI and CT Scan centres at Trichy. 3. When Krishna MRI and Scan Centr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d in the scan license of Krishna MRI and Scan Centre. Following this, the respondent issued the impugned order dated 08.06.2018 forbearing the writ petitioner from carrying on with her work of Sonologist until further orders. The reason given in the said order is that the petitioner has breached the provisions of Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....): Each medical practitioner qualified under the Act to conduct ultrasonography in a genetic clinic/ultrasound clinic/imaging centre shall be permitted to be registered ith a maximum of two such clinics/centres within a district. The Consulting hours for such medical practitioner, shall be clearly specified by each clinic/centre" It is seen that the said Rule was inserted by G.S.R.418(E), dated....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s that the petitioner has breached the Pre-conception and Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994. This is rather a vague ground. Only in the counter, the issue as regard the writ petitioner's qualification has been brought up. It is well settled that an order will have to be tested on the basis of what it contains. An order cannot be improved by a subsequently ....