2021 (7) TMI 163

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ms. K. Komathi, Authorized Representative (A.R.) for the Respondent ORDER The only issue involved in the present appeal is refund under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Shri T.R. Ramesh, Learned Advocate, appeared for the assessee-appellant and Ms. K. Komathi, Learned Authorized Representative, appeared for the Revenue-respondent. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ected Rs. 22,42,907/- in terms of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Notification No. 27/2012-C.E.(N.T.) as amended, holding that the same shall lapse in terms of first proviso to Section 142 (3) of the C.G.S.T. Act, 2017, which order came to upheld by the First Appellate Authority vide impugned Order-in-Appeal No. 149/2018 (CTA-II) dated 31.03.2018. Aggrieved by the same, the a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appellant filed the refund claim within one year from the end of the quarter. 5. During the course of arguments, Learned Advocate for the appellant relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Commissioner of C.Ex., Coimbatore v. M/s. GTN Engineering (I) Ltd. reported in 2012 (28) S.T.R. 426 (Mad.), which has been referred to by the Hon'ble High Court of Kar....