2010 (8) TMI 1145

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant and Sh. B.S. Gupta, counsel for the Respondents. Application for impleadment is allowed. 2. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 22nd October, 2002 passed in Regular Second Appeal No. 4141 of 2002, which affirmed the judgment and Order of the First Appellate Court dated 30th September, 2002 passed in Civil Appeal No. 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r of issues including the issue of maintainability of the suit for non-joinder of the necessary parties. After considering the case in totality, the Trial Court recorded the finding on the said issue that suit was not maintainable for want of necessary parties and the suit was dismissed. The First Appellate Court reversed the finding on the said issue merely observing that the Respondents/Plaintif....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Delhi AIR 1977 SC 1701; The State of Kerala v. The General Manager, Southern Railway, Madras AIR 1976 SC 2538; Chief Conservator of Forests, Government of A.P. v. Collector and Ors. AIR 2003 SC 1805 : 2003 AIR SCW 1251 and The District Collector, Srikakulam and Ors. v. Bagathi Krishna Rao and Anr. JT 2010 (6) SC 227 : AIR 2010 SC 2617 : 2010 AIR SCW 3727. 5. In view of the above, we are of the co....