Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (6) TMI 694

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ers of Central Excise, Raipur that some of the manufacturers of excisable products have been involved in clandestine removal of excisable goods i.e. sponge iron, MS ingots, MS Billet etc. manufactured by them through the appellant herein who has been the commission agent for the manufacturers M/s. Shree Sita Ispat and Power Ltd.; that the search was conducted in the business premises of the appellant under Panchnama dated 20.12.2006 based upon the incriminating records relating to clandestine removal of the aforesaid excisable goods that the show cause notice No. 23851/2010 dated 23.12.2010 was served upon the appellant proposing the imposition of penalty upon the appellant under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 1944 for the act of connivan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rd including the order under challenge and the orders relied upon by both the parties, it is observed that the adjudicating authority below has based its findings upon that the entries recovered from the premises of Kailash Traders to have not been disputed by the Kailash Traders and there has already been judgement in favour of the Department dated 23.05.2017 and 25.9.2013 bearing Final Order No. 57814-57815/2013. I have the opportunity to peruse the judgement dated 23.5.2017 as has been filed by the learned Departmental Revenue. Perusal thereof shows that the judgement is absolutely silent about any evidence produced by the Department against M/s. Kailash Traders. From paragraph 5 of the said judgement, it appears that the decision is res....