2021 (6) TMI 405

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ioner and Mr. A. Kumaraguru and Mr. N. Ramesh, on behalf of the official respondents and also perused the materials placed before this Court. 3. The petitioner filed W.P. No. 3949 of 2020 seeking similar relief for the period from February, 2020 to 31.05.2020. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court on 10.03.2020 allowing the petitioner to travel out of country for the specified period with certain conditions, after appreciating the factual position. While passing the said order, this Court also took into account the order dated 07.02.2020 passed by the Special Court (PC Act), Rouse Avenue District Court, Delhi, in RC No. 221/2018/E0003/CBI/EOU-VII-EO-III/New Delhi. Now, there is no much difference in the factual position, exc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nior Counsel for the petitioner brought to the notice of this Court that those documents have been furnished to the second respondent and the same have been annexed as Sl. No. 2 in Annexure B to the complaint dated 19.03.2020 filed by the second respondent before the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA, 2002, New Delhi. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner also submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish any other documents required by the second respondent. 6. The claim of the respondents that the conduct of the petitioner in overstaying at abroad beyond the originally permitted period proves his non-cooperation for the investigation cannot be accepted for the simple reason that the petitioner was constrained ....