Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1987 (2) TMI 15

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rence under section 27(i) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as " the Act "), the Income-tax; Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, has referred the following question of law to this court for its opinion : " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessments for the assessment years 1971-72, 1972-73 and 1973-74 were ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 205 for 1970-71, the Board has accepted that this Kothi is not exempt. Hence, the value of this Kothi is to be included in the net wealth of the assessee. Therefore, to bring to tax the escaped value of the above property, action under section 17(1)(b) is necessary. " Thereafter, the Wealth-tax Officer proceeded to assess the assessee afresh for the assessment years in question. Aggrieved by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o the conclusion that the reference has to be answered in the negative and in favour of the assessee. The only reason recorded by the Wealth-tax Officer for reopening the assessment was that the Central Board of Direct Taxes was of the view that the value of Shriniwas Kothi was not exempt from wealth-tax. It is now well settled as a result of the decision of the Supreme Court in Indian & Eastern N....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the case. He had exempted this property on the ground that it was exclusively used for residential purposes and was not put to any other use. It is quite obvious that while taking this decision, he considered the fact of the assessee actually living in Lal Bagh Palace as irrelevant. That palace did not belong to him. He was allowed to reside there merely as a result of an administrative arrang....