TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2021 (4) TMI 1103
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.....M.Kaushik for Mr.S.Sridhar JUDGMENT M.DURAISWAMY, J. Challenging the order passed in I.T.A.No.437/Mds/2011 in respect of the Assessment Year 2007-08 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, "B" Bench, the Revenue has filed the above appeal. 2.The above appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law: "1)Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....al before this Court under Section 260A of the Act, raising the following substantial question of law: "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the tribunal was right in holding that the assessee will be entitled for deduction u/s 80IB(10) with respect to income from flats measuring less than 1500 sq ft limit and assessee will not entitled for deduction u/s 80IB(10) proportiona....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or deduction, under Section 80IB(10) of the Act, in respect of the other flats in the project in question, which were built less than 1500 square feet. 5.It had been further submitted that the Tribunal ought to have held that, as per Section 80IB(10) of the Act, the assessee is entitled for the deduction, in respect of the project "Elegant Estate Palmere Gardens" only, if all the residential uni....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... on behalf of the appellant, as well as the respondent and in view of the decisions rendered by this court, in Arun Excello Foundations (P) Ltd. (supra), we find that the order passed by the Tribunal, dated 27.2.2015, is correct in the eye of law. Hence, the contentions raised on behalf of the appellant cannot be countenanced. Thus, the question of law raised in the appeal is answered against the ....