2016 (3) TMI 1398

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The Respondent : Sri. Chetan Desai, HCGP For R1. ORDER The petitioner is accused No.2 in C.C.No.10892/2011 on the file of IX Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore. The petitioner along with another Manzoor Ahmed Khan were charge-sheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 381 and 420 r/w Section 34 of IPC. 2. It appears that inspite of best efforts, the presence of this petition....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... useful purpose would be served. The presence of the petitioner is required before the Magistrate, before whom he is not ready to go and surrender. If the inherent powers are exercised to quash the proceedings against the person who do not respect the process of Court, it would amount to abuse of process of Court to protect such persons. Hence, it would be just and proper that the petitioner to su....