Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2021 (3) TMI 938

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....under: (i) A case was booked by the DGCEI, Madurai against the appellant-assessee under O.R. No. 2/2006/DGCEI/MDU dated 07.03.2006, for short payment of Education Cess on Domestic Tariff Area Sales. In that connection, the appellant paid an amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- under protest vide challan No. 177/2005-06 dated 15.03.2006 as per the above said DGCEI's Offence Report as advance deposit of Educational Cess. (ii) Subsequently, Show Cause Notice No. 02/2007-CE dated 10.08.2007 was issued to the assessee and after due process of law, the Adjudicating Authority vide Order-in-Original No. 09/2007 dated 20.11.2007 confirmed the demand of Rs. 13,98,763/- with interest, vacated the protest recorded by the appellant while paying ad....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i Iron & Steel P. Ltd. v. C.C.E. & S.T., Hyderabad-III [2017 (358) E.L.T. 462 (Tri. - Hyd.)]; (vi) M/s. Universal Heat Exchangers Ltd. v. Commr. of C.Ex., Coimbatore [2015 (329) E.L.T. 936 (Tri. - Chennai)]; 5. Learned Authorized Representative for the Revenue while supporting the findings of the lower authorities, would also rely on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s. Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandal Ltd. v. Commissioner of C.Ex. & Cus. reported in 2005 (181) E.L.T. 328 (S.C.). He would also refer to the accounting procedure which is not followed by the appellant, but that the appellant had only furnished a Chartered Accountant certificate which is not a conclusive proof. 6. He also points out to the obs....