2021 (3) TMI 925
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t Commissioner (AR) for the respondent ORDER PER: C J MATHEW Though none appeared for M/s Hazel Mercantile Ltd, the appellant challenging order-in-original no.78/2009 CCI JNCH dated 21st April 2009 of Commissioner of Customs (Import), Jawaharlal Nehru Custom House, Mumbai, we proceed to dispose it off on the basis of records and the submissions made by Learned Authorised Representative as the m....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....en only transhipped through Korea, originate in Shanghai, China and, thus, liable to duty of Rs. 38,99,602, comprising of Rs. 29,35,142.43 and Rs. 9,82,459.72 against the respective bills, under the said notification. 3. In the grounds of appeal, it is contended that the liability of anti-dumping duty on 'citric acid monohydrate' ceased with expiry of the term of the notification on 23rd November....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... a bald assertion. In these circumstances, we cannot find fault with the conclusion in the impugned order that the goods were required to be subject to test of compliance with conditions in notification no. 78/2000-Customs dated 26th May 2000. 5. The appellant is correct in pointing out that the cited provisions of the Export Import Policy are intended to protect importers from detriments arising....