2020 (8) TMI 839
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....udeep Kumar, Rishabh Pandey Counsel for the Respondent : C.S.C. 1. Today when the matter was taken up through Video- Conferencing Shri Sudeep Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri H.P. Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos. 1 to 3 appeared. 2. Let notice be issued to respondent nos. 4 to 7, on taking appropriate steps within a period of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....to whom the molasses is sold or supplied. 5. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that in the case of M/s SAF Yeast Company Private Ltd v. State of U.P. [2008 NTN (38) 296], a Division Bench of this Court has held that the administrative charge is a tax and against this judgment, a Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.16261 of 2009, State of U.P. and another v. M/s SAF Yeast Co. P. Ltd. wa....