2021 (3) TMI 34

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndent : No appearance JUDGMENT PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order passed in Review Petition in Appeal No.110 of 1984, on the file of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board, New Delhi. 2.It is alleged that the respondent Sakunthala had received payment unauthorisedly in her residential premises at Madurai. It happened, howeve....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....company. As he had requested the husband of the respondent to send the amout, it was arranged by him to be received by the said Sakunthala to be handed over to the said Loganathan. The receipt of the said amount of Rs. 75,000/- was in violation of the provisions of Section 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(a) of the 'Act' and a show-cause notice was issued and an explanation was sought for from the respond....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that the non-receipt of Rs. 75,000/- by the appellant at S.No.2 in the order conflicting with the conclusion reached in Appeal No.110 of 1984. Thus giving the benefit of doubt to the appellant at S.No.2, the Appellate Board has set aside the earlier order passed imposing punishment of fine. The said order is now under challenge in the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal by the Enforcement Directora....