2021 (2) TMI 616

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....emant Haryan, AGP for Respondents-State. ORDER P.C. : Heard Mr. Bharat Raichandani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Hemant Haryan, learned AGP for the respondents-State. 2. Challenge made in this writ petition is to the order dated 14.12.2020 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal-VI), Mumbai i.e., respondent No.5 rejecting the appeal of the petitioner. 3.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... on 13/9/2013 by M/s. ABG Infralogistics Ltd., holder of Tin No.27980353459 V/C against the A.O. passed on 29/6/2013 by the ACST (I-21) Investigation Br., Mumbai for the period 2005-06 under the CST Act, 1956. 2) Assessment record. Heard: None. ORDER (Under Section 9(2) of the CST Act, 1956 read with Section 26(5) of MVAT Act, 2002) No.DC/APP-VI/CST-2031/13-14/6136....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to produce the declarations since 2013. Finally appellant was called on 10/11/2020. On 10/11/2020 Mr. Dheya Joshi, CA along with Mr. Atul Gavas, Chief Operating Officer attended and requested for adjournment. As one more opportunity the date was fixed on 8/12/2020. But nobody attended nor any kind of communication received from appellant. It seems that appellant is not interested in lega....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... on 14.12.2020 and was rejected with the observation that petitioner was not interested in the legal remedy. 5.1. Mr. Raichandani submits that contrary to the observation made, petitioner is very much interested in the appeal as it has been saddled with a huge amount of tax demand which he wants to contest before the appellate forum. He further submits that consequent to dismissal or rejection ....