TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2021 (2) TMI 616
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....te. ORDER P.C. : Heard Mr. Bharat Raichandani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Hemant Haryan, learned AGP for the respondents-State. 2. Challenge made in this writ petition is to the order dated 14.12.2020 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal-VI), Mumbai i.e., respondent No.5 rejecting the appeal of the petitioner. 3. Assessment order dated 28.06.2013 / 29.06.2013....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Tin No.27980353459 V/C against the A.O. passed on 29/6/2013 by the ACST (I-21) Investigation Br., Mumbai for the period 2005-06 under the CST Act, 1956. 2) Assessment record. Heard: None. ORDER (Under Section 9(2) of the CST Act, 1956 read with Section 26(5) of MVAT Act, 2002) No.DC/APP-VI/CST-2031/13-14/6136 Mumbai Dt: 14/12/20 The present appeal petition is filed by M/s. ABG Infra-lo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....heya Joshi, CA along with Mr. Atul Gavas, Chief Operating Officer attended and requested for adjournment. As one more opportunity the date was fixed on 8/12/2020. But nobody attended nor any kind of communication received from appellant. It seems that appellant is not interested in legal remedy. Hence the order. ORDER Appeal is rejected. As a result of this appeal, the order passed by asses....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s that contrary to the observation made, petitioner is very much interested in the appeal as it has been saddled with a huge amount of tax demand which he wants to contest before the appellate forum. He further submits that consequent to dismissal or rejection of the appeal as above, respondents have now initiated recovery as well as prosecution proceedings against the petitioner. 6. Learned AGP ....